|
GPLv2 copyright suit targets 14 firms
2009-12-14
On behalf of the developers of the BusyBox embedded utilities collection, the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) filed suit against 14 consumer electronics companies for violating GPLv2 licensing requirements. The lawsuit covers almost 20 Linux-based products, from companies including Best Buy, Samsung, Westinghouse, and JVC, says the SFLC.
The SFLC filed its copyright infringement lawsuit in New York today on behalf of the Software Freedom Conservancy, the "non-profit corporate home" of the BusyBox application, among other FOSS projects, as well as on behalf of Erik Andersen, one of the principal BusyBox developers and copyright holders. The suit charges each of the defendants with selling products containing BusyBox in violation of the terms of its GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2) license, principally by not publishing source code for the product. The suit is the latest of several lawsuits filed by the SFLC in recent years on behalf of the open source BusyBox, a collection of utilities that is widely used in embedded Linux devices. As far as we know, all of the suits have been settled out of court in favor of the plaintiffs (see farther below for background). This is the first such SFLC suit, however, to target so many different companies and products at once, says the pro bono legal organization. Best Buy's Insignia NS-WBRDVD Blu-ray Disc Player
Stated SFLC counsel Aaron Williamson, "We try very hard to resolve these types of issues privately with companies, as we always prefer cooperation. We brought this suit as a last resort after each of these defendants ignored us or failed to meaningfully respond to our requests that they release the source code." We last heard from the SFLC in May when the organization announced that Cisco had settled a previous lawsuit the SFLC had filed regarding GPL violations. The lawsuit, which covered Linksys brand devices, including the popular, Linux-based Linksys WRT54GL WiFi router, was notable in that it was the only such suit filed by the SFLC that did not mention BusyBox as a principal plaintiff, and the only one filed on behalf of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). Previous lawsuits encouraged a number of settlements by several other heavy-hitting firms. For example, Verizon settled with the SFLC when it was discovered that Actiontec's MI424WR wireless router, used by Verizon's FiOS customers, violated the GPL. Other recent SFLC lawsuits have included suits against Extreme Networks, and a separate multi-company suit against Bell Microproducts and SuperMicro Computer, among others. Availability More information on today's lawsuit, "Software Freedom Conservancy et al. v. Best Buy et al., 09-cv-10155-SAS," which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, may be found in a PDF of the filing, here. Related Stories:
|